Let's hold them accountable

Towards the end of April, Hilary Clinton made claims about botched abortions in Brazil (i.e. she claimed to have visited hospitals where "half" the women were "fighting for their lives against botched abortions"). When called to account for her comments, there was a failure to produce any evidence. Still she has yet to retract this statement.

On Wednesday, Nancy Pelosi claimed that Nancy Regan's support of embryonic stem cell research "has made a significant difference in the lives of many American people. It has saved lives. It has found cures." But the truth is that embryonic stem cell research - unlike adult stem cell research - "has not helped a single human being", it "has produced no cures or treatments, has led to the destruction of countless vulnerable human embryos". In other words, it has killed many human beings.

Concerned Americans should call on Pelosi to substantiate her claim with evidence. When she is unable to do so, she should be forced to publicly retract it, as should Clinton. It's time that those in power were held accountable for their false statements.

We should also remember that it is one thing to be simply in error and another thing entirely to deliberately lie. As Scripture says concerning heaven: "During the day its gates will never be shut, and there will be no night there. The treasure and wealth of the nations will be brought there, but nothing unclean will enter it, nor anyone who does abominable things or tells lies. Only those will enter whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life." (Rv. 21:25-27) Let's hope both women were merely mistaken. If so, they should be willing to repudiate their errors.

References: Nancy Pelosi Misleads on Embryonic Stem Cell Research at Reagan Statue Event | Secretary Clinton, Congressman Smith Spar on Abortion (4/09)

[6/4]

They Don't Really Want Choice

Those who claim to be "pro-choice" once again display their true colors - they don't want a woman to make a real choice - they want her to have an abortion. If they truly wanted a woman to make a choice, they wouldn't seek to prevent her from viewing an ultrasound of the child in her womb. They'd rather have her think it was a "blob of tissue" than see the fingers, toes, and face of her child. As reported by LifeNews, "When used in pregnancy centers, ultrasounds persuade most women to keep their baby." But so-called "pro-choice" advocates don't like this "choice" - so they oppose bills like the one Sebelius is under pressure to sign requiring that pregnant women be given the opportunity to view an ultrasound. Some put forth the excuse that it "creates more obstacles to women already facing a tough decision." They also don't want pregnant women to receive information on the health risks posed by abortion. Since when does limiting information help a woman make a choice? Clearly, they don't want her making a real "choice". Rather, they simply want her to kill her baby. But then again it isn't too surprising that those who advocate murder also consent to lies and deception. [3/18]